As electric cars grow in popularity, workplace charging becomes more important.
Yet while it provides a convenient option for drivers--especially those without their own garages for charging at home--workplace charging can also pose management problems for the companies that offer it.
DON'T MISS: Workplace Charging Doubles in Two Years, 90% Of Charging Stations Full
The more employees who take advantage of workplace charging in coming years, the more carefully employers must consider access, infrastructure, and energy costs.
Simply filling a parking lot with charging stations isn't always the best way to go, according to advocacy group Plug-In America, which outlined best practices for workplace charging in a recent blog post.
While not offering a one-size-fits-all approach, the group says it hopes to create a baseline for companies looking to promote electric-car adoption at a sustainable cost and with minimal environmental impact.
MetLife electric-car charging station for employee use - Johnstown, Pennsylvania
That could potentially mean foregoing free charging.
While giving something away for free may seem like a good way to get people on board, Plug-In America notes that electricity costs generally aren't a barrier to electric-car ownership.
Plugging in is almost always cheaper on a per-mile basis than filling up with gasoline.
RELATED: Why Workplace Charging Is Important: It Sells Electric Cars
Instead, free charging can actually create too much demand--ultimately reducing the effectiveness of workplace charging through overcrowding and high costs to the company.
Instead, Plug-In America recommends charging employees a rate just above the market rate. This also encourages charging at home during off-peak hours, taking some stress off the grid.
Solar canopy at Ford World Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan
The type of charging equipment installed also needs to be considered: Level 1 (120-Volt) or Level 2 (240-Volt)?
Level 2 charging stations add complexity, the group says, because they provide more range than is needed for the average commute.
Employees could end up paying for more energy than they need, and cars that have been charged to full capacity may need to be moved mid-day.
ALSO SEE: Why Electric-Car Charging At Work Matters: Explaining The 'Duck Curve'
Many cars charging simultaneously could also attract extra utility-demand fees, the post says.
The solution? Slower--but potentially more predictable--120-volt Level 1 charging using either dedicated stations or conventional wall outlets.
This means cars will likely have to spend an entire workday charging, but it's not like their owners will be going anywhere.
Houston's Tranquility Park Garage with GRIDbot charging stations
On the other hand, anticipating that cars will charge for a full workday allows employers to charge a set hourly rate that's easier to align with electricity use.
Cars also don't have to be shuffled as they finish charging.
With that in mind, Plug-In America recommends mostly Level 1 charging billed at slightly higher than the market electricity rate, with some Level 2 stations available at a higher rate.
The entire blog post is worth reading, as workplace charging continues to grow--and debates over these issues bubble up at more and more companies.
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook, Twitter, and Google+.
Sign up to get the latest green car and environmental news, delivered to your inbox daily!
I agree to receive emails from Green Car Reports. I understand that I can unsubscribe at any time. Privacy Policy.
A production Kia EV9 could nudge closer to the Rivian R1S, with three-row seating and something akin to traditional SUV off-road capability.
Models with the larger 91-kwh pack and all-wheel drive gain 13 miles of range, to 290 miles of EPA-estimated range, according to Ford.
Mercedes and VW look to Canada for the EV supply chain. BMW, GM, and Ford aim to incentivize off-peak charging. And California is putting its 2035 gasoline vehicle ban into policy. This and more, here at Green Car Reports. California is making its planned 2035 end date for gasoline vehicles the...
States that follow California emissions rules represent about a third of the U.S. auto market, and they each may also adopt the new targets.
Charging EVs at off-peak times makes use of otherwise excess capacity, keeping the level of demand more considerate.
The two automakers announced deals that should move more of the battery supply chain to North America, potentially satisfying EV tax credit stipulations.
Polestar battery tech is going into some fast, efficient watercraft. Toyota and CARB are cooperating. And EVs cost far less to “fuel” than gasoline vehicles. This and more, here at Green Car Reports. According to recent estimates from the Department of Energy, every U.S.-market EV costs less than $1,000 to “fuel”—meaning charge with electricity—compared to $2,000 to $7,000 for most gasoline vehicles. Hybrids and plug-in hybrids were in the middle. The EV maker Polestar has made an agreement with fellow Swedish firm Candela that will put Polestar’s...
Gasoline models cost much more to fuel, while hybrids and plug-in hybrids were in the middle with estimated annual fueling costs of $1,000 to $2,000.
California sets more aggressive emissions standards and electric vehicle targets, and it's joined in doing so by a growing group of states.
Candela's tech uses 80% less energy at high speeds versus traditional motorboats; as with electric cars, greater efficiency translates to more range.
The EV tax credit revamp might have some companies reexamining U.S. production plans. Audi teases a rugged crossover EV concept. And Kia reveals performance and spec details for the quickest EV6. This and more, here at Green Car Reports. Kia has announced U.S.-market details for its quickest, most...
According to Kia, it can out-accelerate models from Ferrari and Lamborghini—as well as the Tesla Model Y Performance.